Study of migration of Library Management Systems (LMS) in Western regional Indian libraries
Part A: INFORMATION ABOUT PRESENT Library Management System (LMS)
1. What is the current status of LMS in your Library?
a) Have installed Library Management System (LMS) [ ]
b) Is undergoing a new LMS installation [ ]
c) Is undergoing transition to a new LMS [ ]
d) Is in process of procurement of new LMS [ ]
e) Does not have any LMS at present [ ]
2. What is the name of your present LMS?
LibSuite [ ] Sanjay [ ] SOUL [ ]
SLIM [ ] Librarian [ ] Granthalaya [ ]
LibSys [ ] In-house Software [ ] Any other, ___________
3. Is your present LMS
a) an in-house LMS [ ] b) a proprietary LMS [ ]
c) an open source LMS [ ] d) Not Sure [ ]
If you are using a proprietary LMS, the proprietary rights are with
a) Library [ ] b) Vendors [ ]
c) Shared / Consortium [ ] d) Not known [ ]
4. Please indicate the origin of your LMS
a) Foreign origin (e.g. Alice for Windows, BASISplus, etc.) [ ]
b) LMS developed over foreign LMS (e.g. DELSIS, SANJAY, etc.) [ ]
c) Indian origin (e.g. LIBSYS, SOUL, TULIPS, etc.) [ ]
d) Not known [ ]
5. For how many years are you using your current LMS?
a) < 1 year [ ] b) 1-2 years [ ]
c) 2-5 years [ ] d) > 5 years [ ]
6. What core services are supported by your LMS?
a) Acquisition [ ] b) Circulation [ ]
c) Cataloguing [ ] d) Serial Control [ ]
e) Training to staff & users [ ] f) Data exchange format [ ]g) Online Public Access [ ] support
Catalog i.e. OPAC
7. What services are available in your LMS for easy and effective retrieval of information?
a) Customized Reporting & management information [ ]
b) Graphical User Interface (GUI) based user interface & colour [ ]
c) Inter-library loan & reservation [ ]
d) Multi-lingual support [ ]
e) Automatic messaging for claim, reservations, reminders, etc [ ]
f) Any other, please specify __________________________________
8. Does your LMS provide any of following features? (Tick all that apply).
a) Easier application for Library users and staff [ ]
b) Availability of application modules and subsystems [ ]
c) Coordination between existing subsystems and application modules [ ]
d) Cost effective in terms of hardware, software update, etc. [ ]
f) Require further programming support [ ]
g) Prompt and proper vendor services in case of problem [ ]
h) Extent of vendor support while upgradation of software [ ]
i) Provide clear set of instructions for library staff for migration schedule [ ]
j) Favourable experience of neighbouring libraries using same LMS [ ]
9. Does your LMS support any of following internationally accepted data standards and protocols?
a) Anglo American Cataloguing Rules-2 (AACR - 2) [ ]
b) Common Communication Format (CCF) [ ]
c) MARC / UNIMARC / MARC 21(MAchine Readable Catalogue) [ ]
d) ISO 2709 [ ]
e) Unicode standards [ ]
f) RFID protocols [ ]
g) Support for the storage of metadata structure and formats [ ] (eg. Doublin Core, XML, etc)
h) Information Retrieval Protocol Z39.50 [ ]
10. In your opinion what additional features you would have liked in your present LMS?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. How do you grade performance of your present LMS?
a) 100% [ ] c) 50 – 70% [ ]
b) 70 - 99% [ ] d) Can’t say [ ]
PART B: MIGRATION EXPERIENCE
13. In the past 10 years, how many times did your library go through LMS migration?
One time [ ] More than once [ ]
14. If your library has already undergone a migration process, which LMSs were used before present migration?
LibSuite [ ] Sanjay [ ] SOUL [ ]
SLIM [ ] Librarian [ ] Granthalaya [ ]
LibSys [ ] In-house Software [ ] Any other, ___________
15. Why did your library take a decision to migrate from earlier LMS?
a) cost factor - maintenance [ ] c) administrative reasons [ ]
b) quality improvement [ ] d) economic reasons [ ]
e) New features if any ___________________________________________
16. What factors were considered while migrating to present LMS? (Tick all that apply)
a) Mandated by University administration [ ]
b) Mandated by vendor agreement [ ]
c) High ongoing maintenance cost [ ]
d) Earlier LMS was outdated [ ]
e) Additional updates not available [ ]
f) Need for increasing functionality [ ]
g) Need for another hardware platform [ ]
h) User complaints [ ]
i) Unresolved system problems [ ]
j) Lack of support and service [ ]
k) Lack of confidence in former vendor [ ]
l) Lack of database standards [ ]
m) Earlier Vendor no longer available [ ]
n) Other (please list), _________________________________ [ ]
17. What other features guided you for actual choice of migration?
a) Cost saving [ ]
b) Better system [ ]
c) Vendor recommendations [ ]
d) Library Survey [ ]
e) Market analysis [ ]
f) Financial reasons [ ]
g) Administrative ease [ ]
18. Which selection tool was preferred while selecting present LMS?
a) Request for proposal (RFP) [ ]
b) Vendor survey [ ]
c) Review of literature on ILMS & ILMS vendors [ ]
d) Professional consultants [ ]
e) Library committee decision based on neighboring libraries [ ]
f) Any other _________________________________________
19. What pre-migration preparations were required before actual migration? (Tick all that apply)
a) Library staff training [ ]
b) Data backup of circulation, acquisition, serial control, etc. at different [ ]server
c) Informed users about unavailability of library for certain period during [ ]and after migration
d) call back all the books and settle all overdue cases before switching [ ]over to the new software
e) Call back all the hard bounds and loose journal issues from users [ ]
f) Used manual method or other server for transactions [ ]
g) Any other _________________________________________
20. What procedure was adopted while migrating from old LMS to new LMS?
a) Did a test run with test plan with set of test data for expected [ ] results before actual implementation
b) Did a part wise system installation (pilot run) [ ]
c) Both old and new systems were run simultaneously (Parallel run) [ ] till expected results and then switched working with a new LMS
d) Implemented new LMS from certain cut off time [ ]
PART C: DATA TRANSFER
21. Who were actively involved in LMS migration process? (Tick all that apply)
a) Vendor – software team [ ] d) Customer IT support [ ]
b) Library staff [ ] e) Third party consultants [ ]
c) Outside IT experts [ ]
22. Approximately how much time was spent on data transfer / for data entry?
a) Upto 6 months [ ] c) 1 to 2 years [ ]
b) 6 months – 1 year [ ] d) More than 2 years [ ]
23. Who was responsible for data entry while migrating?
a) Library staff [ ] b) Company staff [ ]
c) Software Agency [ ] d) Contact vendors [ ] Please Name - __________________
24. While doing data conversion, the problem areas were (Tick all that apply)
a) Data compatibility [ ] b) Lack of standards in previous data [ ]
c) Software limitations [ ] d) Any other, ______________________
25. Could you transfer previous data to new LMS entirely during migration? Yes [ ] / No [ ]
26. If not, how did you work with partial data?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
PART D: Based on experience of System Librarians and professional staff
27. For your LMS migration were the vendors involved in? (Tick all that apply)
a) Marketing and delivering present LMS [ ]
b) Data transfer from old LMS to new LMS [ ]
c) Data Entry for previous database [ ]
d) Library Staff Orientation [ ]
e) User Orientation [ ]
f) Tailored modifications in LMS as per library [ ]
g) Post implementation troubleshooting [ ]
h) Free upgradation for specific time period [ ] Please indicate time in years _________________________________
28. Please indicate the role of library staff in overall system migration process (Tick all that apply)
a) Pre-migration preparations [ ]
b) Library Staff Orientation [ ]
c) Data transfer process [ ]
d) Re-data entry [ ]
e) Post migration problems troubleshooting [ ]
f) Member of user group of vendor user group [ ]
g) Any other, pl. specify __________________________________
29. On scale of 1 to 5, indicate capability scores of your present LMS functionality for,
a) Operability [ ] d) Effort needed to perform an operation [ ]
b) Ease of use [ ] e) Response time [ ]
c) Flexibility [ ] f) Reliability [ ]
30. Please indicate features of your LMS experience (Tick as per applicability stage)
a) Currently available / support all data elements [ ]
b) Currently available / covers important elements [ ]
c) In testing / will cover all elements [ ]
d) In testing / will cover important elements [ ]
e) In development / will cover all elements [ ]
f) In development / will cover important elements [ ]
g) Can be extended to support all elements [ ]
h) Currently available but needs customization [ ]
i) In test but will require customization [ ]
j) In development / will cover limited elements [ ]
k) Not available / no plans to support listed features [ ]
31. Please indicate your LMS expectation from present LMS.
a) Exceeds library expectations [ ] b) Excellent [ ]
c) Very good [ ] d) Good [ ]
e) Better than average [ ] f) Average [ ]
g) OK, but could be better [ ] h) Poor [ ]
i) Very poor [ ] j) Crying for attention [ ]
k) Not able to support listed features [ ]
32. On the scale of 1 to 5, how could you grade your overall information transfer experience? { RANK 1-5: EASY-HARD}
a) Easy and smooth transfer of previous data [ ] b) Smooth transfer of previous data but took time [ ]
c) Data transfer process is time consuming & tedious [ ]
d) Complicated process and requires lot of time [ ]
33. Would you suggest any specific steps to ensure smooth migration so as to guide other libraries?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
If yes, please specify _____________________________________________________
34. Researcher intends to create a sharing platform, a blog, to share migration experience with library professionals, vendors and technical experts. Would you like to share?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
Suggestions
Please feel free to add comments about your experience regarding LMS that might not have been covered in this survey.
Please let me know if you would like a summary of my findings. I have created a sharing platform, a blog, at http://ojas-lms.blogspot.com to share migration experience with library professionals, vendors and technical experts.
_________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
Thanking you for your valued time and support,
(Ojaswini Upasani)
Dear Sir / Madam,
May I request you to kindly provide me with the following details; if possible. I assure you the same will be kept as ‘Strictly Confidential’.
Name
Designation
Educational Qualification
Experience
Name & Address of Institute / University / College
Thanking you for your kind co-operation and support.
1 comment:
Your topic is interesting as well as important. Moreover you are lucky to have humble guide like like Dr. D. N. Phadke. I am also blessed by his guidance. This is the first time I am dealing with Blog spots. So rather than me helping you, you only have to help me to understand blog spots technology. Click on link http://www.geocities.com/cilisindia to know about how I have made available my Research Project on Net.
Post a Comment